Search for: "Dates v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 30,201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2007, 2:17 am
Asylum Act provision is incompatible Regina (Nasseri) v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 7:47 am
Such was the case recently in Palmore v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:19 pm
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 3:28 am
From yesterday: Thomas Jones v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 4:17 pm
However, as he acknowledged at oral argument, his case falls squarely within the ambit of our recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 1:05 pm
Ryan Eddinger won in State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS/TAX EVASIONUnited States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
INS v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:18 pm
V. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 10:08 am
Regina (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Ministerial power to detain an overstaying immigrant was limited only to the process of deportation; any detention under the immigration provisions would be subject to the control of the courts, principally by way of judicial review. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:06 am
<> United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 2:39 pm
In United States v.Conrad Clinton Blair, No. 12-4427, the Court rejects an expansive reading of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Descamps v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 2:10 am
State’s duty to investigate Regina (JL) (a Youth) v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm
Supreme Court described it in Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:42 pm
United States. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:42 pm
United States. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:47 am
Alton and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “An organisation that had no capacity to carry on terrorist activities and was taking no steps to acquire such capacity or otherwise to promote or encourage terrorist activities could not be said to be concerned in terrorism simply because its leaders had the contingent intention to resort to terrorism in the future. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 9:07 am
GO and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Overseas students could change their courses but if they wanted an extension of stay in the United Kingdom, they had to be able to produce evidence of satisfactory progress, whether on the course named in the application for entry clearance or on another recognised course. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 3:38 am
Regina (Rayner) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “The statutory scheme dealing with the referral of a recalled mental patient to a mental health review tribunal was not incompatible with the patient's rights under article 5.4 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 2:36 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) Queen’s Bench Division “Fair trial provisions guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights could not be overcome by a claim that the offended party's case had no possible chance of success. [read post]
