Search for: "Dave v. Dave" Results 1 - 20 of 1,206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2010, 3:48 am by Broc Romanek
Dave & Marty on Engagement, SOP Transition, Repurchases and Bob Seger In this podcast, Dave Lynn and Marty Dunn engage in a lively discussion of the latest developments in securities laws, corporate governance, and pop culture. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:29 am by Seth
  Back in 1995, Thomsen worked with Famous Dave’s “flagship” Linden Hills Twin City location on the [...] [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 4:08 am by Broc Romanek
Dave & Marty on Choice of Forum, Crowdfunding and Breweries In this podcast, Dave Lynn and Marty Dunn engage in a lively discussion of the latest developments in securities laws, corporate governance, and pop culture. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 4:08 am by Broc Romanek
Whistleblower Can Go "De Novo" If DOL Doesn't Act A few weeks ago, the Fourth Circuit - in Stone v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 6:02 am by lpbncontracts
In a characteristically insightful blog post, Dave Hoffman uses Vokes v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:57 am by Broc Romanek
In this 20-minute podcast, Dave Lynn and Marty Dunn engage in a lively discussion of the latest developments in securities laws, corporate governance and pop culture, including: - Analysis of the new shareholder proposal decision in Apache Corporation v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm by Glenn Reynolds
DAVE KOPEL: EZELL AND DOCTRINAL RULES FOR THE SECOND AMENDMENT: “The Seventh Circuit’s decision in Ezell v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 4:01 pm
Dan Kahan, Dave Hoffman, and my colleague Don Braman have responded to my post on their new article on Scott v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:40 am
Dave Hoffman has an interesting post over at Concurring Opinions on the dispute between Justices Stevens and Scalia (and Thomas) over whether the death penalty deters. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:34 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: OP 11-0021, 2012 MT 28, DAVE BURLEY and JEANNIE BURLEY, Plaintifffs and Petitioners, v. [read post]