Search for: "Davenport v. Attorney General"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2012, 6:15 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 4:05 am
A petition for certiorari (full text) in Davenport v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 2:17 am
The strangest thing about the oral argument three weeks ago in Davenport v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 6:22 pm
In June, in Davenport v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 11:59 am
Facts of the Case In the recent (unreported) case of Davenport v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 12:05 pm
Pliler and Davis v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 7:54 am
Davenport, 2007 WL 4246271 (S.D.Ohio November 29, 2007). [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 4:30 am
In what may be one of the first post-Rancosky decisions (but in which Rancosky was not cited), summary judgment was granted on a homeowner's insurance bad faith claim in the Federal Middle District Court case of Davenport v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 1:43 pm
The Supreme Court's 2008 ruling in Baze v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 10:51 am
In general, attorney fees cannot be recovered unless a statute or contractual provision explicitly allow it. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 10:56 am
In Nat’l College of Business & Technology Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:36 am
For more information about drug interdiction generally, see my August postings on the topic. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
That is the great tragedy, for example, in the current litigation among the former university President, the former university general counsel and the university over the role of the general counsel and the character of advice she provided. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
In Davenport v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 7:20 am
In Davenport v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 6:17 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I just ran across Nero v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:17 pm
In Davenport v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:26 am
The Georgia Bar Association generally does not get involved with attorneys for minor legal problems such as misdemeanors. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 3:50 am
Hakima Benaddi v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:20 pm
In today's Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin has this article on Solicitor General Paul Clement - "one of the conservative legal movement's brightest stars" - who is now charged with overseeing the Justice Department's investigation into the controversy over the firing of U.S. attorneys; Peter Lattman weighs in here at the WSJ.com Law Blog. [read post]
