Search for: "David Engstrom"
Results 41 - 60
of 91
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2020, 7:08 pm
Stanford Law School Professors David Freeman Engstrom and Daniel Ho, NYU Law Professor Catherine Sharkey, and California Supreme Court Justice Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar served as principal advisors on the report. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 7:38 am
In this Q and A, Stanford Law Professors David Freeman Engstrom and Bernadette Meyler address that controversy, including what it might mean for the future of foreign affairs federalism. [read post]
13 May 2019, 12:42 pm
As David Engstrom’s preview explained, the 11th Circuit held that relators can invoke Section 3731(b)(2) in suits in which the United States is not a party and that Section 3731(b)(2)’s three-year limitations period does not begin until the government learns of the alleged fraud, regardless of when the relator discovers it. [read post]
2 May 2019, 2:00 am
University of Texas at Austin School of Law – David Engstrom, Professor of Law, Associate Dean for Strategic Initiatives, and Bernard D. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 2:19 pm
As explained in David Engstrom’s preview, the law’s original statute of limitations, Section 3731(b)(1), requires lawsuits to be filed within six years of the alleged fraud. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am
David Engstrom had this blog’s preview. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Engstrom v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Engstrom v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:13 am
At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, David Freeman Engstrom remarks that in Epic Systems v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:15 pm
Confirmed speakers include Judge Diane Wood, Janet Alexander, Elizabeth Burch, Margaret Lemos, David Engstrom, Myriam Gilles, and Deborah Hensler. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
Commentary on Epic Systems comes from Joel Nolette at The Least Dangerous Blog, David Freeman Engstrom in an op-ed for The New York Times, and Arthur Bryant in an op-ed for The National Law Journal. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:46 am
Stanford Law Professor David Freeman Engstrom wrote a useful op-ed in the New York Times explaining why three cases argued in the Supreme Court today are … Continue reading Important Employment Arbitration Cases in the Supreme Court → [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 6:37 am
But as Stanford lawprof David Freeman Engstrom remind us, there were other forces at play at the same time. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 3:21 am
Court’s Rejection Of MasterCard Class Action” [Daniel Fisher] Revisiting a failed 1978 proposal to replace class action with hybrid public/private enforcement [David Freeman Engstrom, U. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:14 am
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, David Freeman Engstrom weighs in on California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 8:57 am
David Freeman Engstrom (Stanford Law School) has posted 'Not Merely There to Help the Men': Equal Pay Laws, Collective Rights, and the Making of the Modern Class Action (70 Stanford Law Review __ (2018, Forthcoming)) on SSRN. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 12:58 pm
David Freeman Engstrom, Stanford Law School, has posted two papers on the history of class actions. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 3:21 pm
At JOTWELL, Nora Engstrom reviews David Engel's The Myth of the Litigious Society: Why We Don't Sue. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 3:30 am
David M. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:40 am
” In an essay in the Stanford Law Review Online, David Freeman Engstrom and Jonah Gelbach discuss California Public Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
