Search for: "David Hricik" Results 1 - 20 of 147
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 9:50 am by David
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School Over on Gene Quinn’s IPwatchdog page, former chief judge Rader has written an article about the Supreme Court’s 101 jurisprudence. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:30 am by David
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School I realize most readers aren’t law professors, so you can stop now… I have taught IP courses for years and often the books seek to teach the subject through cases, which is a very difficult way to learn it. [read post]
24 May 2023, 7:18 am by David
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School In a single decision issued by several panels, the Board held that the patentee had failed to act in good faith by, boiled down, intentionally withholding material test data that was inconsistent with the arguments it was making in favor of patentability of both original and proposed substitute claims. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:50 am by David
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) requires that fraud or mistake be pled with particularity. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:12 am by David
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School As has been reported by Dennis on the main page, by Gene Quinn on IP Watchdog (here), and by various media I am seeing, Chief Judge Moore reportedly threatened Judge Newman with a petition to remove Judge Newman as incompetent to carry out her duties unless Judge Newman agreed to take senior status. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm by David
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School Noted below, Akin Gump had sued a former vendor, Xcential, arguing that its lawyers had invented what Xcential had sought to patent. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 10:08 am by David
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School I’m speaking at a conference in Palo Alto, and one long topic of conversation was about the disagreement between how Judge Albright views Fifth Circuit precedent on mandamus to review discretionary transfers under Section 1404 and the Federal Circuit views that same precedent. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 8:58 am by David
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School Ordinarily, under Model Rule 4.2 you cannot communicate with a person represented by counsel in a matter without opposing counsel’s consent — even if opposing counsel is present (the rule is not limited to “ex parte” communications). [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 8:04 am by David
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School Giving a talk in Austin and thought I’d share a couple of interesting results I’ll be speaking about later today. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 2:01 pm by Dennis Crouch
  I’m primarily interested because I want to understand what the court was saying, but the outcome here is related to essays that David Hricik and I wrote a few years ago about whether lack of eligibility is a proper defense under Section 282 of the patent act. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 2:25 pm by David
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School The October 4, 2022 presidential decision awarding sanctions against OpenSky LLC and its counsel is here. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 2:08 pm by David
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School Judge Albright granted Google’s motion to transfer venue under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) from the Western District of Texas to the Northern District of California in an opinion in Motion Offense LLC v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 11:58 am by David
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School After Prince, the musician, died an engineer who had unreleased recordings hired a Massachusetts firm who advised the engineer that he was a joint author of the recordings and jointly owned copyright in them, and so could distribute the recordings subject to paying Prince’s estate a share of royalties. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 1:06 pm by David
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School As a follow up to an earlier post, today the Ohio Supreme Court in Revolaze LLC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:02 am by David
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School Judge Payne in Mobile Equity Corp. v. [read post]