Search for: "David Luban" Results 181 - 200 of 236
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2008, 9:37 am
David Luban addresses torture for tots, and other weaknesses of ticking bomb arguments, in a new paper available here. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 9:37 am
David Luban addresses torture for tots, and other weaknesses of ticking bomb arguments, in a new paper available here. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 6:30 am
Legal Ethics and Human Dignity, Professor David Luban's newest book, has recently been published by the Cambridge University Press. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 7:55 am
  Marty Lederman and David Luban disagree over whether there is any point to this investigation. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 3:41 am
My colleague David Luban has argued, alternatively, that it does. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:38 am
We've had discussions here and have cited to David Luban, Kathleen Clark, Stephen Gillers, and others, about the possible bases for ethics charges against OLC lawyers (independence and candor of advice; competence, etc.). [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 5:55 am
It is an impressive set of thoughtful essays by the likes of David Dyzenhaus, Frederick Schauer, David Luban, Joseph Vining and many others. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 12:43 pm
  First is Pepper's The Lawyer's Amoral Ethical Role: Download pepper_article_1.pdf  Next is Luban's response, The Lysistratian Prerogative: Download lubanlysistratian_2.pdf  (David Luban reminded me that his views have undergone some revisions over the last 21 years, but despite that I am sure you'll enjoy his response to Pepper.) [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 9:37 pm
(For excellent discussions of this very topic, see posts by David Luban at Balkanization and by Paul Secunda at Workplace Prof Blog.) [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 9:20 am
Over at Balkinization, David Luban explains in Much Ado About Nothing that one of the issues raised in the suit brought by Jose Padilla against John Yoo is whether "a lawyer [can] be held liable for advising a client about... [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 11:08 am
David Luban (Georgetown) has a helpful analysis of what's at issue. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 10:14 pm
For topnotch analysis of legal issues in the suit, check out this new post by our colleague David Luban.Particularly notable: David's recap of U.S. prosecutions against German government lawyers "in the second round of Nuremberg trials. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 5:01 am
Over at Balkinization, David Luban has an extensive post on the issues and non-issues in Padilla v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 7:42 pm
David Luban has a great meta-post on Padilla v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 5:11 pm
The always-worth-reading David Luban posts his thoughts about Padilla v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 9:30 am
., my posts here here, and here, this one from Jack, this one from David Luban, and Stephen's excellent corrective post just today on DOJ's objections to the Japanese internments.I hope to be able to post more in the coming days about the interesting lawsuit filed by Jose Padilla against John Yoo. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
        "The Vindication of Major Mori" was the apt title of David Luban's article about Major Michael Mori, who represented David Hicks, an Australian detained in Guantanamo. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 10:11 pm
(I welcome my colleague and co-blogger David Luban to weigh in here.)All of which is to say that I think it's a fairly interesting and difficult question what legal standards OPR should apply when assessing OLC's conduct. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 4:44 pm
I argued that as a matter of both consequentialist knowledge and deontological culplability; this was disputed by many serious people, including the very serious moral and legal philosopher David Luban. [read post]