Search for: "David Luban"
Results 121 - 140
of 238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2010, 8:08 am
Now, David Luban has offered this reply. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:40 am
Here's, "The Conscience of a Prosecutor," the 2010 Tabor Lecture at Valparaiso, by David Luban. [read post]
30 May 2010, 9:27 am
David J. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:47 am
For example, I think the perspective of David Luban, or of Bill Simon, would tend to orientate more towards decision in context than towards the application of a rule across circumstances. [read post]
27 May 2010, 9:10 am
Finally, David Luban has reviewed the Daniel Markovits book that we've discussed here at some length and which Monroe Freedman (with Abbe Smith) reviewed and criticized. [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:33 am
David J. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:36 pm
David Luban (Georgetown University Law Center) has posted The Rule of Law and Human Dignity: Reexamining Fuller’s Canons (The Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
22 May 2010, 3:16 am
O'Sullivan, David Luban, and David P. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 12:54 pm
This isn't an original point with me -- David Wilkins and David Luban have both made it powerfully -- but it still goes relatively unappreciated. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:14 pm
David Luban, Fairness to Rightness: Jurisdiction, Legality, and the Legitimacy of International Criminal LawAntony Duff, Authority and Responsibility in International Criminal Law [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 7:40 am
Center-left legal critics of the Bush administration, including well known commentators like David Luban, Scott Horton, and Marty Lederman, face what I would call the "Jackson problem. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 4:54 am
Today, we have a front page NYT story; an op-ed from former Attorney General Michael Mukasey urging people not to condemn either today's DOJ lawyers or the ones who worked there during the Bush administration for representing their clients; a more sharply partisan piece by Marc Thiessen; and a reply from David Luban at Balkinization arguing that his criticism of the torture memo lawyers was legitimate and Cheney's attack is illegitimate. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:39 pm
Larry Solum (Legal Theory Blog) Jack Balkin (Balkinization) Gene Volokh (Volokh Conspiracy) Orin Kerr (Volokh Conspiracy) Dick Posner (Becker-Posner) Kim Krawiec (Faculty Lounge) Al Brophy (Faculty Lounge) Sandy Levinson (Balkinization) Steve Bainbridge (Professor Bainbridge) Dan Solove (Concurring Opinions) Rick Hills (Prawfs) Paul Horwitz (Prawfs) David Luban (Balkinization) William Henderson (ELS) Dan Markel (Prawfs) Danille Citron (Concurring Opinions) Frank… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 10:21 am
"No. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:12 pm
Most theories of legal ethics utilize what he calls (after David Luban) the “adversarial system excuse,” or the consequentialist view that the lawyerly vices are justified as part of a legal system that is just overall. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:48 pm
And rightly so, exposing him for the right-wing hatchet man posing as a balanced journalist that he really is. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 8:04 am
At Balkinization, David Luban and Stuart Taylor debate the meaning of "torture. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
” David Luban critiqued Taylor’s article at Balkinization. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:55 pm
by Kevin Jon Heller David Luban and Stuart Taylor are having an interesting exchange at Balkinization over whether the CIA’s use of waterboarding qualifies as torture under the federal torture statute, 18 USC 2340. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 6:45 pm
David Margolis also found no fault with Bybee-Yoo on ? [read post]
