Search for: "David Woolf v. State"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
Woolf v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 7 June 2023, the plaintiff’s defamation claim was struck out and dismissed as an abuse of process in the case of Woolf v Brandt (No 2) [2023] NSWDC 184. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am
I also set out the reasons why David Perry QC had approached the case on that basis at the time. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:36 am
His submission, by David Pannick and David Sherborne, sets out UK authority (such as the the Spycatcher case, Lord Woolf in the Flitcroft decision, the House of Lords decision in Cream Holdings v Banerjee, and the Court of Appeal in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am
Second, the Supreme Court will in the near future decide a case on the subject of compensation for miscarriage of justice in the case of R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm
One of the best known examples of this point of view was that advanced by Lord Woolf in A v B plc [2003] QB 195, (the Gary Flitcroft case), in which he argued that ‘any interference with the press has to be justified because it inevitably has some effect on the ability of the press to perform its role in society. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:53 pm
The appeal, known as ETK v NGN Ltd , was listed in private. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am
On the same day, Gibson DCJ decided to grant leave for the plaintiff to amend his statement of claim in Woolf v Brandt [2022] NSWDC 623. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm
Poor Gary Flitcroft was something of a standard bearer when he sought his injunction in A v B almost a decade ago. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
And so… for a short time… we move away from the blawgs of the United States of America…. [read post]
