Search for: "David v. Texas" Results 1 - 20 of 2,289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2021, 5:22 am by Steve Lubet
David Garrow has an oped in today's Houston Chronicle, calling on Texas abortion providers to make history, as did Estelle Griswold in 1965. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:14 am by Steve Hall
In his latest book, Capital Punishment on Trial: Furman v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:00 am by John Mikhail
This week and next at Balkinization we are hosting a symposium on David Schwartz’s new book, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 1:46 pm by Ruthann Robson
Smith, District Judge David Alan Ezra ruled that Texas statute and regulations requiring internment (or cremation) for "embryonic and... [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:26 pm by David Bernstein
(David Bernstein) As Ilya notes below, the Fifth Circuit has upheld the University of Texas’s racial and ethnic preference practices in Fisher v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 4:05 am by Todd Zywicki
(Todd Zywicki) A cert petition has been filed in Fisher v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:13 am by Steve Hall
"Supreme Court Outlawed Executing Mentally Retarded, But Texas Does It Anyway," is the title of David R. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Memorandum: Plaintiffs, who reside in New York, commenced this breach of contract and legal malpractice action against Texas attorney Russell Button, Esq., and his law firm, the Button Law Firm, PLLC (collectively, Button defendants), as well as New York attorneys David C. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 4:40 am by Dan Hargrove
  Here is the indictment:103067084-USA-v-Michael-D-Goodwin-case-2-12-CR-097 [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:39 pm by David Bernstein
(David Bernstein) My contribution to Scotusblog’s symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 4:43 am by Immigration Prof
At Notice & Comment, David Rubenstein and Pratheepan Gulasekaram explain how states might challenge executive nonenforcement policies in the posture of defendants—what they call “ex post judicial review”—and suggest what this alternative route could entail for questions of standing, separation... [read post]