Search for: "Davidoff v Davidoff"
Results 181 - 190
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 1:52 pm
Delaware Chancellor Allen's decision in Mendel v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm
Tesón, Eminent Scholar Emeritus, Florida State University Signatories as of December 12, 2021 (additional signatures will be added as they arrive): Jesse Fried, Dane Professor of Law, Harvard Law School Steven Davidoff Solomon, Alexander F. and May T. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Dallas Professor of Law University of San Diego School of Law Steven Davidoff Associate Professor of Law University of Connecticut School of Law George W. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
Davidoff Associate Professor of Law University of Connecticut School of Law George W. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal… [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
[v] Two examples of these strategic practices emerged following the Delaware Court of Chancery’s decision in the Trulia case[vi] and the Supreme Court’s decision in the Cyan case. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
