Search for: "Davidoff v Davidoff"
Results 141 - 160
of 190
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2009, 9:20 am
Syst. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 7:43 am
On June 19, 2009, in Zino Davidoff SA v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
(Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) Hill Times features op-ed by Michael Geist concerning copyright lobby recycling (Michael Geist) Owner of Glo Salon and Spa sues former employees now working at competitor for $6.4 million in damages over alleged misappropriation of trade secrets in the form of client lists and client colour cards (IP Osgoode) Federal court issues practice direction aimed at streamlining complex litigation (International Law Office) China Get involved in Chinese IP policy… [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 2:03 am
Second Circuit rules that the unauthorized removal of anticounterfeiting devices from otherwise genuine trademarked products is actionable as trademark infringementKilpatrick Stockton LLP"In Zino Davidoff SA v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:05 pm
Marty (The Trademark Blog) extracts from the 11th Circuit’s ruling in Davidoff v CVS, where the parallel importer was found liable for infringement by removing the UPC codes (which, of course, are not put there to detect parallel import leaks, but in case of product recall requirements). [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 2:15 pm
Similar to the 10th Circuit case I posted recently, the 2d Circuit recently issued a decision concerning whether re-sale of materially altered goods under the original trademark can constitute trademark infringement.In Zino Davidoff SA v. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 5:08 am
davidoff v cvs [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 4:51 am
His Lordship wryly observed that relations obviously weren't as cosy on the consent issue in Davidoff and how they really reached their low point in Arsenal on the badge of origin issue. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:16 pm
By Judy V. [read post]
12 May 2009, 4:21 pm
San Antonio Fire & Police Pension Fund v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 8:48 am
Steven Davidoff, on his Deal Professor blog here, discusses the Chancery Court decision in Hexion v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:45 am
Posted by Jeff Lipshaw Courtesy of Steve Davidoff, we've learned that the Delaware Supreme Court has just issued its opinion, reversing the Chancery Court's troubling denial of summary judgment (under §102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law) in Ryan v.... [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 2:58 pm
See Malpiede v. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 7:36 pm
UPDATE: Professor Davidoff has an update here on the potential settlement and related issues. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Dallas Professor of Law University of San Diego School of Law Steven Davidoff Associate Professor of Law University of Connecticut School of Law George W. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 8:01 am
Davidoff and posted by George R. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 2:32 am
We see a well reasoned opinion of Justice Warshawsky in the matter of Arbor Secured Funding v. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 12:23 pm
His references of preliminary questions to the European Court of Justice demonstrated, among other things, how effectively he could construct a set of questions in order to sharpen the minds of jurists in Luxembourg (as in Zino Davidoff v A&G) and how boldly (in Arsenal v Reed) he could resist their responses when it seemed to them that the senior European court had usurped his own judicial functions as a trial judge. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
You have come to the right place (IP Dragon) Court protects transliteration of well-known international enterprise name (International Law Office) How to go to China for innovation (China Law Blog) Costa Rica Costa Rica approves Free Trade Agreement between US, Central America and Dominican Republic (CAFTA) (IP tango) Europe EU judges on Community patent and court (IAM) (Managing Intellectual Property) European IP forum considers standards-setting (Managing Intellectual… [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 9:34 am
" Thanks to Neil McCarthy, Editor-in-chief of LawyerLinks and Steve Davidoff, I just read the transcript of the oral argument, which revolved around the issue of whether such a proposal would unduly constrain the discretion of the board. [read post]
