Search for: "Davies v. Miller" Results 201 - 220 of 570
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am by Maria Kendrick
By Maria Kendrick The much awaited High Court judgment of 3 November 20161)R Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). was an historical decision which saw the Executive’s use of prerogative powers delineated in the context of Treaty making, and unmaking, in a successful Judicial Review against the Government. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Lin, Professor of Law, University of California, Davis, School of Law—Community Levers for Benefit Sharing James N. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
Building on its decision in Miller v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:45 am by INFORRM
The joined appeals in Flood v Times Newspapers and Miller v Associated Newspapers in which the press arguing that CFA success fees and ATE insurance are contrary to Article 10 have been listed for a three day hearing on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Many commentators, including members of Congress and presidents, criticize judicial rulings as being influenced by improper philosophies or even by improper desires to protect partisan interests—think, for example, about the criticism of the conservative majorities in Bush v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Previously, he served as the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis School of Law. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:12 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Dudley (New York University Law School and Independent) have posted The Place of Families in Juvenile Defense Work after Miller v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 9:54 am by Orin Kerr
Miller, 425 U.S. 435, 443 (1976); Phibbs, 999 F.2d at 1077-78. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
But last week the Ninth Circuit decided a case that shows how tricky government consideration of race can be, and how lower court judges sometimes make missteps in this complex area.The case is Mitchell v. [read post]