Search for: "Davis, John v. DOJ" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2020, 3:21 am by Walter Olson
” [Annie McDonough, City and State NY] “After DOJ Letter on Website Compliance, The ADA Guessing Game Continues” [John D. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 9:30 am
But in the meantime, I thought our readers would be interested in another context in which DOJ interpretations have occasioned recent controversy: the current Second Amendment case in the Supreme Court, D.C. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Simon Stern The government’s motion to dismiss in CREW v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Herrera v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
Freed, Center for Political Accountability, on Friday, February 26, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
Pastuszenski, Goodwin Procter LLP, on Tuesday, July 18, 2017 Tags: California, Class actions, Jurisdiction, New York, PSLRA, Securities Act, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, SLUSA, State law, Supreme Court CalPERS v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The saga of Kim Davis continues, with the Sixth Circuit affirming that the former county clerk of Rowan County, Ky. does not enjoy qualified immunity for refusing to issue marriage licenses in the wake of Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am by Jack Sharman
District Judge John Gleeson in Brooklyn is a defeat for HSBC and the U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Posner, Cooley LLP, on Monday, December 19, 2022 Tags: board diversity, California, Crest v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Posner, Cooley LLP, on Monday, December 19, 2022 Tags: board diversity, California, Crest v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 5:00 am by Randi Morrison
However, as discussed in Proskauer’s blog, in a fairly concurrent case, the US District Court for the Central District of California, in Jennifer Davies v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And also, a starkly different holding from the Tenth Circuit in the wake of Egbert v. [read post]