Search for: "Davis Personal Property, Specifically Described As"
Results 81 - 100
of 162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm
Explaining this holding, Judge Gross relied on New York law, which governs the trust: The court in Estate of Morse, 177 Misc.2d 43, 676 N.Y.S.2d 407, 409 (N.Y.Sur.1998), described the broad reach of New York's concept of standing: In that light, it has been noted that “anyone who would be deprived of property in the broad sense of the word ... is authorized to appear and be heard upon the subject” of whether a will that would thus affect him adversely should be… [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 11:41 am
Their petition raises six assignments of error.The last two points of error deal specifically with the manner in which Judge Bellows of the Fairfax County Circuit Court ignored individual donors’ intent to hold that a Virginia statute (§ 57-10), which no party had cited or argued to him, dictated that the church’s personal property (pledges and gifts) had to follow its real property. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 5:39 pm
California constitutional law limits a private property owner's right to exclude persons seeking access for purposes of exercising their free speech rights "if the property is freely and openly accessible to the public" which includes places that are the functional equivalent of a public forum. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 10:04 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada looked specifically at these issues several years ago and rejected attempts to use copyright to stop such activities. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:54 am
Davis addressing statutory construction, and Mr. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 2:00 am
Professor of Law at UC Davis School of Law. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am
Holding that persons of African descent are not U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 11:08 am
" Specifically, a disabled person would visit the website of a hotel that she has no intent of staying at. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:52 am
In both of these cases, the defendants were charged with intimidation by specific means. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
UPDATE: May 4, 2016 – RIME (on May 2) filed a memorandum in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgement claiming that his mural was not illegal and part of the Detroit Beautification Project after specific invitation of the Project’s founders and with explicit assurances that the artwork was being undertaken legally and with the permission of the affected property owners. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
. or bring into contemp[t] or disrepute” any “persons, living or dead. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
In addition, T-Mobile has a Privacy Policy which describes how they collect, use, disclose, and store personal information of its customers. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 1:42 am
Force majeure is a term generally used to describe those contractual terms which provide relief to a party from performance of the contract following the occurrence of certain events. [read post]
2 May 2013, 8:04 pm
Davis v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am
May 23, 2018) is primarily a mootness case, though it contains an interesting discussion of the recent 8th Circuit decision Davis v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
”) Davis v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 11:08 am
Charity Nevius, Personal Representative of Estate of Gary Nevius, deceased (NFP) In John and Dorothy Arndt & Arndt, LLC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
It was used both to describe the “guardian deity or spirit which watches over each person from birth”5 and the “rational soul of every one. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
If TM is property, it is property defined by the supposed perceptions of the average consumer. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 2:03 pm
A much easier solution—and one that is fully supported by the precedent—is to limit the non-discrimination principle as described above. [read post]
