Search for: "Davis v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2020, 5:34 am
Davis and Helvering v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 11:26 am
") AC36335 - Davis v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:02 am
Davis (10th Cir.1995) 55 F.3d 553 ; Combined Management, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
Extension of Federal Funding of Extended Unemployment Compensation The FFCRA provision that provided temporary full federal funding of Extended Benefits for high-unemployment states is extended through March 14, 2021. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
WCAB panel decisions are citeable authority, particularly on issues of contemporaneous administrative construction of statutory language. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 8:56 am
” Walling v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
That is one of the provisions of the Act that the Court has agreed to review, in response to constitutional challenges by 26 states. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 10:15 am
Fringe benefits include “medical or hospital care, pensions on retirement or death, compensation for injuries or illness resulting from occupational activity,” as well as unemployment benefits, life insurance, and vacation and holiday pay. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Administrative law -- Agency for Health Care Administration -- Attorney's fees -- Action arising from Department of Administrative Hearings' finding that AHCA's withdrawal of an application for a home health care facility license, due to what the AHCA perceived as an incomplete application, was incorrect -- Error to award applicant attorney's fees and costs pursuant to section 57.111 despite favorable order from DOAH -- Where, at the time the withdrawal… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
In this respect, the Act resembles the Social Security Act, with one very important difference—namely, that the ACA offers employers greater discretion, a choice, about how to satisfy that social obligation. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
It is important to emphasize, therefore, just how unprecedented that challenge is—and the potentially profound impact it could have on countless federal spending programs if the Court were to embrace it.It has long been accepted, without a whisper of any constitutional doubt, that “[a]lthough participation in the Medicaid program is entirely optional, once a State elects to participate, it must comply with the requirements of the [Act],” Harris v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm
With the Trump Administration U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
The California Agricultural Labor Relations Act of 1975, as amended by the Davis Administration in 2003 to provide for interest arbitration in first contract negotiations, was viewed as a dream statute from the perspective of collective bargaining proponents, seen particularly through the lens of the inadequacy of the National Labor Relations Act. [read post]
