Search for: "Davis v. Alabama Power Company"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2020, 5:34 am
Davis and Helvering v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
Particular areas of focus in the agencies’ request for information are the “purpose and scope of merger review[,] presumptions that certain transactions are anticompetitive[,] use of market definition in analyzing competitive effects[,] threats to potential and nascent competition[,] impact of monopsony power, including in labor markets[, and] unique characteristics of digital markets. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 10:06 am
Georgia v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Parke-Davis, 733 P.2d 507, 515-16 (Wash. 1987); Bond v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Washington and Davis v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
Davis asks the now-familiar question whether Miller v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
Whether the Australian court has jurisdiction to enforce the judgment against a US-based company is another question, discussed by media law experts Professor David Rolph and Dr Damien Spry here. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm
The Relationships between Speech and Conduct, UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 49, 2016, Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 16-16, Jane R. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
Rock Star Videos, Inc., 547 F.3d 1095, 1099 (9th Cir. 2008); see also Univ. of Alabama Bd. of Trustees v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm
What’s Happening in Washington Dan Jaffe, Executive Vice President, Government Relations, ANA It’s within our power to affect how present challenges are resolved. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
Tracy v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 2:13 am
FERC; Upper Peninsula Power Co., et al. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
Several other public officials had also sued the Times, and the litigation over the ad became a bet-the-company proposition. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Davis 15-424Issue: Whether the First Amendment protects a speaker against a state-law right-of-publicity claim that challenges the realistic portrayal of a person in an expressive work. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Thus, at best, Karl has just created a regime of redundant and overlapping liability with the patients stuck in the middle - not knowing whom to believe if doctors and drug companies say different things.The learned intermediary rule thus makes sound practical sense. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
” We were briefly excited when Davis v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 6:37 am
It was about her husband, Wayne Davis, they said. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
Surveillance The ECHR case of Big Brother Watch and Others v UK sheds light on the application of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 to GCHQ investigative measures involving the interception of communications. [read post]
