Search for: "Davis v. Bader"
Results 1 - 20
of 144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2011, 8:51 am
But, if the Court were unwilling to take that step (advocated in Davis v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:39 pm
Davis, 587 U.S. ___ (2019)- (opinion of the Court).Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
Davis, No. 16-6795. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:59 am
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg passed away from complications from pancreatic cancer on Friday, September 18, 2020. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
With Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s seat on the Supreme Court now filled, many are taking stock of her judicial legacy. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:34 am
Then the case can go the way of Herrera [v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
” Trialdex previews Banister v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:05 am
The case is State Office of Risk Management v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 12:32 pm
In a 1993 decision, Herrera v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 7:46 am
Davis, when, early in his opening presentation, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg suggested that the court could decide the case on narrower grounds than those presented in his petition – by ruling that his client’s claim that his direct appellate counsel provided ineffective assistance was meritless. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:29 am
Davis v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 8:04 am
Davis, No. 16-6219. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 6:37 am
The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday in Fort Bend County, Texas v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
Monday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour or oral argument on Davis v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 11:20 am
Justice Ginsburg with opinion in Fort Bend County, Texas v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:32 am
Davis, No. 17-6883, Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a dissent, in which Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined, from the denial of certiorari. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
Justice Alito also delivered the opinion of the Court in Davis v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:01 pm
Today's first ruling issued in Davis v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 5:27 am
’” In an op-ed for the San Francisco Chronicle (subscription or registration required), Bob Egelko compares Justice Clarence Thomas’s comments in his concurring opinion in the Court’s recent decision in Davis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:41 am
Supreme Court, in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
