Search for: "Davis v. Bryant"
Results 61 - 80
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2015, 2:39 pm
Two cases in 2006, Davis v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 5:43 am
Doran saw an African–American male [Jefferson Bryant Davis] wearing a white tank top running across the 8000 block of SE Washington Street. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:08 pm
Since Crawford, however, the Court has decided Davis v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 5:11 am
Washington and Bryant v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:06 am
Bryant, although the internet citation of Ashmore v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:42 am
Washington and Davis v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:57 am
In Bryant, you’ll recall (and if you don’t you can read about it here), the Court expanded upon the “primary purpose” test for determining whether a statement is testimonial, which the Court had earlier established in Davis v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:45 am
Washington and Davis v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 11:33 pm
It was, in the words of Bryant, "reflexive. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 11:53 am
Davis v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:31 pm
Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), Davis v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:26 am
Bryant (oral argument discussed here). [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:10 pm
Presumably Carruth assumed that the court would hold that the 911 call did not violate the Confrontation Clause because of the emergency doctrine of Davis v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:19 pm
In Thomas v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:31 am
Davis v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 1:29 pm
” (See Bryant-Shannon v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 8:35 am
In Bryant v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 5:04 pm
R (on the application of Bryant and ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis), heard 12 May 2011 (Foskett J). [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Davis, Keesha Davis, Matthew T. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:36 am
While Crawford involved the prototypical ex parte statement — a written statement to police as a result of an interrogation at the station — later decisions, like Davis v. [read post]
