Search for: "Davis v. Cain"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm
CVSG: 5/18/2023 (relisted after the June 22 conference) Davis v. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Lu, Sabastian V. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Lu, Sabastian V. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm
Cain Jr., 90, of Canton, Michigan, died January 11, 2021. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:31 am
Halper, Ellen V. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 04123-19 Philips v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 03262-19 Bromley v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), Resolved- IPSO mediation 08073-18 A woman v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 11 Victims of sexual assault (2018), No breach- after investigation 03816-19 Hayden… [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Davis. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 10:00 am
Davis and Prof. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:18 pm
The decision was greeted with dismay by defendant lawyers and newspapers, including the incredibly-talented Nicky Cain of RPC. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm
Singh v Weayou [2017] EWHC 2102 (QB) (Nicola Davies J). [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 4:07 pm
The Court of Appeal considers the threshold for bringing a libel claim in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd – Iain Wilson and Tom Double Lachaux, Seriously limiting serious harm – Nicola Cain Court of Appeal clarifies serious harm test in Lachaux libel judgment – Ashley Hurst and Alexander Vakil. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 4:07 pm
The Court of Appeal considers the threshold for bringing a libel claim in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd – Iain Wilson and Tom Double Lachaux, Seriously limiting serious harm – Nicola Cain Court of Appeal clarifies serious harm test in Lachaux libel judgment – Ashley Hurst and Alexander Vakil. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 4:07 pm
The Court of Appeal considers the threshold for bringing a libel claim in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd – Iain Wilson and Tom Double Lachaux, Seriously limiting serious harm – Nicola Cain Court of Appeal clarifies serious harm test in Lachaux libel judgment – Ashley Hurst and Alexander Vakil. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm
Davis LJ endorsed the view of Judge Moloney QC in Theedom v Nourish Training Ltd that the presentation of evidence as to serious harm would be of little assistance and would potentially duplicate arguments as to quantum, which would be best left to trial. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm
Davis LJ endorsed the view of Judge Moloney QC in Theedom v Nourish Training Ltd that the presentation of evidence as to serious harm would be of little assistance and would potentially duplicate arguments as to quantum, which would be best left to trial. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm
Davis LJ endorsed the view of Judge Moloney QC in Theedom v Nourish Training Ltd that the presentation of evidence as to serious harm would be of little assistance and would potentially duplicate arguments as to quantum, which would be best left to trial. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 6:24 am
In the case of Times Newspapers Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; and, Frost and others v MGN Ltd ([2017] UKSC 33), the defendant media organisations each brought an appeal to the Supreme Court in relation to the obligation that they pay additional liabilities in cases engaging their right to freedom of expression. [read post]
3 May 2016, 10:29 am
See Brady v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 10:29 am
See Brady v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Seth Davis discusses standing and United States v. [read post]
