Search for: "Davis v. Dyson" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm by Blog Editorial
The Supreme Court will hear two appeals this week commencing with the two day hearing of R v Gnango on Monday 11 and Tuesday 12 July 2011 to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Judge, Kerr, Clarke, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am by Blog Editorial
The two appeals in the Privy Council this week are to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Sir Patrick Coghlin. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:29 am by CMS
” Lady Justice Nicola Davies agreed and permission was granted to the claimants to appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
The first appeal is Ernest Lockhart v The Queen to be heard on Monday 18 July 2011 by Lords Brown, Mance, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
In Tariq v Home Office the Court considered the permissibility and compatibility with European Union law and the European Convention of a closed material procedure authorised by certain statutory provisions. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 5:51 am
It may be frightening for some of them to learn that they face personal liability for injuries to the corporation if those injuries are caused by the board's neglect or mismanagement.That is why I found the case Davis v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:01 am by charonqc
“[Rodial's threat] would be ludicrous, bordering on the farcical, were it not so serious in its wider implications,” said Davis. [read post]
16 May 2019, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
In order to proceed in any individual capacity, a shareholder “must allege something more than wrong to the corporate body” (Davis v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am by INFORRM
Lord Neuberger’s Court of Appeal decision was overturned by Lord Dyson in Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] UKSC 11 (21 March 2012). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Rob Davies, a Guardian journalist was denied a press pass for a major gambling industry exhibition. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:46 am
California, Davis, School of Law; Adrienne Davis, U. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Access to wills of recently deceased members of the Royal Family Matthew Davis v IC EA/2010/0024. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46)   Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46)   South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP)   Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
On 23 June 2023 Steyn J heard an application in the case of Dube v Warwick. [read post]