Search for: "Davis v. Fowler" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2008, 2:11 pm
Read more… or Read more right here… » Here are the first set of cases: Davies v East, January 8, 1788 Ormond v Payne, July 9, 1789 The King v Dodd, May 30, 1808 R v Burdett, November 28, 1820 Collins v Godefroy, January 18, 1831 Vaughan v Menlove, August 2, 1836 Priestly v Fowler, January 17, 1837 Attwood v Small, March 27, 1838 M'Kinnell v Robinson,… [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:19 am by David Oscar Markus
David; Hedrick, Charles V.; Lever Jr., Chauncey W.; Adams, Christi; Griffin, Christopher L.; Kise, Christopher M.; Creely, Curt P.; Bachrach, Daniel (Dan); Zenov, Darin I.; Cook, David C.; Woodson, R Duke; Baxa Jr., Edmund T.; Lotzia, Emerson M.; Magee, Emily; Cerezo, Francisco J.; Ridley, Fred S.; Davis, Gardner F.; Koch, Gary D.; Fernandez-Quincoces, Guillermo J.; Raij, Irwin P.; Arkin, J. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:32 am by James Romoser
Montana, et al.: Specific Jurisdiction’s Next Mile Marker (Nathaniel Fowler, Frost Brown Todd) We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 7:42 am by Lyle Denniston
On Nov. 1, the Court had granted review of Davis v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 7:38 am by Ezra Rosser
-v.-17-2022-.pdf The volume is edited by the remarkable Selma Moidel Smith, who at 103 years old is at long last retiring from her editorship of the journal. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:02 am by Lyle Denniston
 (10-277) — scope of right to bring class-action lawsuit for sex discrimination on the job; also question added by the Court Fowler v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 7:47 pm
James Fowler (University of California-San Diego) and Sangick Jeon (University of California-Davis) have posted “The Authority of Supreme Court Precedent” on SSRN, see here. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 11 July 2018 Nicola Davies J heard an application in the case of Piepenbrock v London School of Economics. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
Tim Davie, acting director general, said that redactions were “driven by external legal advice. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 11:08 am
Kenneth Davis and Jennifer Davis (NFP), a 13-page 2-1 opinion, Judge Najam concludes:Here, the court did not hold an evidentiary hearing on the attorney's fee issue, and there is no indication that it considered the parties' resources, economic condition, or other factors that would bear on the reasonableness of the award of attorney's fees. [read post]