Search for: "Davis v. Hospital Authority"
Results 41 - 60
of 179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
In Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:48 am
That future development came in a pair of domestic violence cases decided the same day, Davis v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:58 am
” The consent form thereby conferred “discretionary” authority on the hospital to determine “whether to remove and retain an organ for further [*2]examination and testing” (Cansev v City of New York, 185 AD3d at 896; see Shipley v City of New York, 25 NY3d 645, 654; cf. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
And in Vance v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 1:01 am
To say that is not to gainsay the point made by Dixon CJ in Mark Foy’s Ltd v Davies Coop and Co Ltd (1956) 95 CLR 190 at 194–5 (the Tub Happy case), that language is not always used to convey a single, clear idea; a mark may have a descriptive element but still serve as a badge of trade origin. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 8:48 am
This month marks the 25th anniversary of Davis v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:25 pm
Read more about the decisions below.Fisher v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:44 am
Davis v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
DAVIS v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation and Botham v Ministry of Defence, heard 22 – 23 June 2011. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Joseph’s Hospital, 527 P.2d 1075, 1077 (N.M. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:04 am
Davis v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation and Botham v Ministry of Defence, heard 22 – 23 June 2011. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Most Viewed Posts of 2022 Here are the most viewed posts that were published in 2022: What American Hospital Association v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:35 am
Distinctive Home Care, Inc., February 1, 2016, Davis, W.). [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:13 pm
” After Crawford, the Supreme Court further explained in Davis v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
EPA and more in the concerns animating Justice Jackson’s concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
He argues that these findings show hospitals may be fined under the Affordable Care Act’s Readmissions Reduction Program for the patients they treat, rather than the quality of care they deliver. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 4:47 am
Accordingly, if a mandatory minimum denies discretionary authority to a sentencing judge, then that authority is a fortiori restored where, as here, no mandatory minimum exists. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:47 am
But the Supreme Court of course has the authority. [read post]
