Search for: "Davis v. Justice Court (1970)"
Results 41 - 60
of 103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2018, 7:17 am
In Davis v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Indeed, as a majority of the Supreme Court in Bush v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 12:21 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:07 am
The court’s citation to Leibert v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 5:30 am
Alien Tort Statute case, Filártiga v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 6:00 am
Two justices -- Chief Justice Davis and Justice Workman -- were disqualified and were replaced by judges sitting by temporary assignment. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Chief Justice Roberts joined the majority in Pavan v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 4:08 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 5 October 2018 Nicola Davies J handed down judgment in the case of Piepenbrock v London School of Economics [2018] EWHC 2572 (QB) (heard 16, 17, 20 23, 24 and 27 July 2018). [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
” Several weeks later, on July 18, Justice Elena Kagan appeared at Georgetown as well, where she recounted her memorable Kimble v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Henry, the trial court found waiver, and 1 dissenting justice on the San Antonio court of appeal agreed. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:51 am
See the comments of Laidlaw J.A. in Davis v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:58 am
Court of Appeal in Davis v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:57 pm
(The case is Territory v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
Bradford Corporation, [1970] 1 WLR 937, Hagop Ardahalian v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:01 am
Davis (26 U.S. 229, 1976), however, the Court ruled against the African-American plaintiffs rejected for positions in the D.C. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm
At Balkinization, guest blogger Sharon Dolovich explains why the Supreme Court’s Farmer v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'” (People v Davis, 13… [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm
In the seminal McCulloch v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm
” But a decade later when the Court in Bolling v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:55 am
Fensterer, supra; Davis v. [read post]
