Search for: "Davis v. Keith" Results 1 - 20 of 99
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2008, 3:38 pm
(William) Davis, No. 05-3784 (6th Cir. 2008) (Sutton, J., Boggs, C.J., & Keith, J.) , the Sixth Circuit reversed, for the second time (see 458 F.3d 491), a sentence of 1-day imprisonment and 3 years of supervised release for bank fraud. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 3:03 pm by admin
Born Duane Keith Davis, the rapper claims he wants to “come clean. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 6:21 am
Here is the abstract:This article was written for a symposium issue of the University of California at Davis Law Review on the fortieth anniversary of Katz v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
In Singh v Weayou [2017] EWHC 2102 (QB), the Claimant Keith Singh, a Night Services Coordinator at the Priory Hospital in Roehampton, sued the Defendant Joseph Weayou, a Health Care Assistant at the same hospital, for libel and malicious falsehood in respect of an email Mr Weayou had sent on 24 August 2015 to the HR Manager and a senior manager at the hospital. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 5:52 am
Young, and Connie Milonakis, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Saturday, January 2, 2021 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Cybersecurity, Disclosure, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Financial reporting, Management, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, SEC rulemaking, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation Shareholder Activism at Closed-End Funds in the Wake of Covid-19 Posted by Keith… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:30 pm
Not surprisingly, yesterday’s decision in DC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 3:40 am by Broc Romanek
Also see the blog by Keith Bishop entitled “Does Former Officer Have An Obligation To Turn Over Whistleblower Award?. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 6:39 am by James Romoser
Tribe, The Washington Post) Court Packing Is Discreditable as Ever (Keith Whittington, The Wall Street Journal) Supreme Court endgame looms over Trump’s January 6 tango with Congress (Gregory Krieg, CNN) As the Supreme Court weighs the future of Roe v. [read post]