Search for: "Davis v. Morris"
Results 21 - 40
of 153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2007, 11:58 am
Colonel Morris Davis, chief prosecutor for the Military Commissions Office, writes his "Defense of Guantanamo Bay" for the Yale Law Journal's Pocket Part, describing the facilities as clean and the prisoners as humanely treated. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 9:19 am
Morris v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 10:28 pm
Judge Brownback disagreed, notwithstanding the fact the military commissions trials have been called a sham, rigged and unjust by defense JAG attorneys, and more recently characterized as ‘politicized' by former military commissions prosecutor Colonel Morris "Moe" Davis. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
Tessili v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:20 am
Law Lessons from KIMBERLY DAVIS HOLLOWAY V. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:16 pm
The Government v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:45 am
Robert Lee Morris Inc. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 6:30 pm
Plaintiffs, Lorillard Tobacco Company, Phillip Morris USA Inc., and R.J. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:57 pm
In Haynes v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:24 am
Div. 2005) (quoting Davis v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
Morris v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 12:36 pm
Morris Davis, the military commissions' former chief prosecutor, thinks so:Sitting just feet from the courtroom table where he had once planned to make cases against military detainees, Air Force Col. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
Two more notable examples came across my desk just today: In US v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 7:25 am
In Mahomed & Anor v Morris & Ors [2000] EWCA Civ 46, the judge commented that it could not have been Parliament’s intention that any outsider to the liquidation who was dissatisfied with the liquidator’s decision could attack it under s 168(5) of the Act. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
Philip Morris, Inc., ___ P.3d ___, 2009 WL 1563373 (Nev. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:21 am
Davis, 100 U.S. 257, 262-63, 25 L. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 11:12 am
Division 3: the work was "complete" enough to merit full payment - Seattle attorney John Parnass of Davis Wright Tremaine in the firm's Washington Construction Law Blog Caveat Emptor: all that is nano may not be so - Ohio lawyer Michael E. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:04 pm
Elizabeth Holland, Suffolk University Law School in Boston, for "Holder v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 9:35 am
The Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision in Sorrell v. [read post]
