Search for: "Davis v. Multiple Access, Inc"
Results 21 - 40
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2017, 8:39 am
An “interactive computer service” is defined as “any information service, system, or access software provider that provides or enables computer access by multiple users to a computer server, including specifically a service or system that provides access to the Internet…. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 11:10 pm
The defendant and his two codefendants were indicted on multiple counts, found guilty, and sentenced. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 9:17 am
July 22, 2015); Davis v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
The motions can be accessed through the hotlinks on the docket sheet. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 4:02 pm
However, in Nationwide Bi-Weekly Administration, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
Penned by Jennifer Brant and Sebastian Lohse, the paper is freely accessible on the ICC’s website. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 3:19 am
[v] The SEC Certainly the majority of the federal activity on cyber security issues has come from the SEC. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:51 pm
Int’l v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 10:23 pm
If I see a CCIA brief that any significant part of its membership openly disagrees with (such as in Oracle v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:46 am
Limelight Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569 (1987) (stating that an airport’s proposed interpretation of a speech-restricting policy would be unconstitutionally vague, even if an airport were to be treated as a nonpublic forum); International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 11:53 am
Oct. 11, 2011), Davis v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 2:57 am
Circuit Judge Rosemary Pooler of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and he then practiced law at Davis Polk & Wardwell and Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke LLP, both in New York City. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
But entities like IV take the view that they are providing a valuable service — they provide inventors with easy access to the economic incentive that fuels invention. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:38 am
Madigan v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 2:13 am
FERC; Public Citizen, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
The majority opinion is itself open to multiple interpretations, however. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
Legalnet, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
Calcar, Inc. v. [read post]
