Search for: "Davis v. Municipal Court" Results 81 - 100 of 224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2011, 3:13 am
" Thus, ruled the court, in order for an individual deprived of a constitutional right to have recourse against a municipality under 42 USC 1983, he or she must show that he or she was harmed by a municipal "policy" or "custom," citing Monell v New York City Department of Social Services, 436 US 658. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  This opinion goes a very long way toward cutting back the expansive definition of "testimonial" statements - and therefore the range of evidence excluded by the Confrontation Clause - that had been stated in Davis v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:42 pm
Also in the Legal Times, Mauro has this article on the Court's 7-2 decision in Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:34 am by Eugene Volokh
Davis (1976) (concluding that defamation by a municipal employee was not actionable under Fourteenth Amendment). [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 6:50 am by admin
Maxzone (Cartel Sentencing) In an important Federal Court decision issued in September, 2012 in the ongoing global auto parts price-fixing investigation (R. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am by Edith Roberts
The court also denied rehearing in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 4:57 pm
López Torres Freedom of Speech and Expression Campaign Finance Regulation: Davis v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday, the court heard oral argument in Czyzewski v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:00 am
Ethan Yale (Georgetown University Law Center) and Brian Galle (Florida State University College of Law) have a new paper that analyzes the Court's United Haulers opinion, and its implications for the recently granted case of Davis v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 12:19 pm
Davis, a case scheduled for next term centering on whether "Kentucky violated the Commerce Clause by exempting in-state municipal bond interest from taxation as income. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 11:35 am by Madelaine Lane
Finally, the Court granted leave to appeal in Miller-Davis Company v. [read post]