Search for: "Davis v. New York State Board of Elections et al" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Matter of Davis v Schley2024 NY Slip Op 02614Decided on May 10, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 10, 2024Before: Moulton, J.P., Scarpulla, Shulman, Higgitt, O'Neill-Levy, JJ.Index No. 153380/24 Appeal No. 2415 Case No.… [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Matter of Davis v Schley2024 NY Slip Op 02614Decided on May 10, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 10, 2024Before: Moulton, J.P., Scarpulla, Shulman, Higgitt, O'Neill-Levy, JJ.Index No. 153380/24 Appeal No. 2415 Case No.… [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:48 pm by Rick Hasen
Guests: Lawrence Norden: New York University Law School, @BrennanCenter Hans von Spakovsky: Heritage Foundation, @HvonSpakovsky Jon Husted: State of Ohio, @OhioSOSHusted Jonathan Chait: New York magazine, @jonathanchait Hilary Shelton: NAACP, @HilaryOShelton Links: CalTech/MIT on voter registration and its effect on turnout 1984 NY Grand Jury report on voter fraud, Election Law blog on Von Spakovsky on voter fraud in New York… [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
It is important to emphasize, therefore, just how unprecedented that challenge is—and the potentially profound impact it could have on countless federal spending programs if the Court were to embrace it.It has long been accepted, without a whisper of any constitutional doubt, that “[a]lthough participation in the Medicaid program is entirely optional, once a State elects to participate, it must comply with the requirements of the [Act],” Harris v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
  The Board also noted that in Penrod v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:17 am
Hearing at New York, Oct. 16, 17, 19, 22, and 23, 2007. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
The Board also adopted the judges' finding that a Gissel bargaining order was necessary and warranted under NLRB v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Dissenting Member Walsh stated: Sound policy considerations underlie the statute's requirement that the showing of interest supporting a deauthorization election must be collected after the employees are subject to a union-security clause. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 4:45 am
  Hearing at New York on Oct. 3, 2007. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank's weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am by David Kopel
In August, The Trace presented a conspiracy about the amicus briefs filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Davis (Assistant Professor, The University of Alabama), Brendan Nyhan (James O. [read post]