Search for: "Davis v. Office of Child Support Enforcement" Results 61 - 80 of 111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2018, 7:25 am by Joy Waltemath
“The right to say ‘no’ to a union is just as important as the right to say ‘yes,’” said Mark Janus, an Illinois child support agency employee and the plaintiff in the case. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Jones, No. 07-5994 In a prosecution for firearm possession by a felon, the District Court's order suppressing evidence is reversed, where the District Court, in assessing whether the officers who arrested Defendant had reasonable suspicion, erred by failing to take into account all information observed by the officers until Defendant yielded to unambiguous police authority. . [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Whorley, No. 06-4288 Convictions for receipt of obscene cartoons depicting minors, receipt of actual child pornography, and receipt of obscene e-mails are unsuccessfully challenged on First Amendment grounds. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit reversed, holding that “a plaintiff can make out a retaliation claim even though the charge against him may have been factually supported. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Edelen, No. 07-1189 Appeal of sentence for 126 months' imprisonment for one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base is dismissed where the appellate waiver, waiving defendant's right to file a direct appeal so long as the sentence imposed was within the applicable Guideline Sentencing Range or lower, was enforceable and valid. . [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Edith Roberts
Are the most patently farcical and protectionist restrictions nigh unchallengeable, or are there, in fact, judicially enforceable limits? [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm by The Blog Team
Grovo, — F.3d —, 2016 WL 3443691 (9th Cir. 2016) (restitution in child porn cases) In United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 4:46 pm
Accordingly, the court granted summary enforcement of the NLRB's order. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), does not authorize the continued and potentially indefinite detention of a removable alien based on a determination by the government that the alien's mental illness renders him a dangerous risk to the community. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Harris, University of California, Davis, School of Law Stephen Lee, University of California, Irvine School of Law Guadalupe T. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am by Jonathan Holbrook
The court rejected the defendant’s invitation to overrule or limit to child victims its holding in State v. [read post]