Search for: "Davis v. Owen"
Results 41 - 60
of 122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
(Infodocket) ICYMI, Trump v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
Davis (1937) and South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:25 pm
Professor of Law at UC Davis School of Law. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm
The use of a weapon, depending on the manner in which it is used, may also be indicative of the intent to inflict serious physical injury (People v Haynes, 39 AD3d 562 [2nd Dept 2007] [defendant killed the victim by driving a car straight at him]); People v Lewis, 300 AD2d 827 [3rd Dept 2002] [defendant killed victim by stabbing victim causing a deep penetrating wound through the back to the heart]; People v Owens, 251 AD2d 898 [3rd Dept 1998] [defendant… [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 7:57 am
Owens-Ill., Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 968.) [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
We had a summary of this by Oscar Davies: Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:16 pm
Davis, 121 Ohio St.3d 239, 2008-Ohio-4527, 903 N.E.2d 609, ¶ 1, citing State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 6:23 am
Owen v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:07 pm
Those who have been following the i4i v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:14 am
sent me: The Supreme Court’s recent decision in American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
In RSPCA (NSW) v Davies [2011] NSWSC 1445, Latham J awarded the RSPCA in NSW damages of Aus$100,000 for defamatory material posted on a website authored by retired “forensic computer detective” Mal Davies. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 12:30 pm
Davis v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 12:29 pm
Siler v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:34 am
HIGGINS, Appellant, v. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 11:10 am
(One for each dollar of his special assessment, on the sole reversed count).United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
” Owen v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
” Owen v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 5:51 pm
Davis v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:26 am
However, in KSR v. [read post]
