Search for: "Davis v. Powers et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 9:59 am
Apple, et al., 6:10cv61 (2/22/11) Judge: Leonard Davis Holding: Motion to Transfer Venue GRANTED While presiding over our trial in the Acqis v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 4:52 am
Abercombie & Fitch, et al. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 5:34 am
Bennett, et al. and McComish, et al., v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 3:36 am
Velazquez, etc., appellant, v Bruno Decaudin, et al., defendants, Arnold Streisfeld, etc., et al., respondents. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:50 am
Legal history-related panels include:ThursdayConfiguring the Cold War: Constructive Courtroom Narratives in Dennis et al v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 3:18 am
Contents include:2013 Lalive Lecture Alain Pellet, The Case Law of the ICJ in Investment ArbitrationCase CommentsWalid Ben Hamida, SAUR International SA c République argentine: Droit national, droit international et droits de l’homme : l’histoire d’un ménage à trois Irmgard Marboe, Quasar de Valores SICAV SA and others v The Russian Federation: Another Chapter of the Yucos Affair Julian Davis Mortenson, Quiborax SA et… [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:03 am
In Haridopolos, et al v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:46 pm
Davis v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
” # # # The Case Against Kramer, et al. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Abdullahi et al. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:57 am
DAVIS, Chief Judge. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 7:25 am
In Davis-Lynch Holding Co., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Levin, Rethinking Religious Minorities' Political Power, (48 UC Davis Law Review, 2015 Forthcoming).Claudia E. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:28 am
As the Florida 5th DCA ruled in the 2004 case of Davis v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
Particular areas of focus in the agencies’ request for information are the “purpose and scope of merger review[,] presumptions that certain transactions are anticompetitive[,] use of market definition in analyzing competitive effects[,] threats to potential and nascent competition[,] impact of monopsony power, including in labor markets[, and] unique characteristics of digital markets. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 5:10 am
§ 13-8-51 et al. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:03 am
Davis, petition, BIO), and on the extent to which Supreme Court decisions against making criminal law decisions retroactive bind the states (Danforth v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 2:41 pm
(See generally Eisenberg et al., Cal. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:25 am
In Faragher v. [read post]
