Search for: "Davis v. Social Security Administration" Results 81 - 100 of 167
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2018, 9:30 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Murphy’s article Pragmatic Administrative Law and Tax Exceptionalism is cited in the following article: Tessa Davis, Tax and Social Context: Legal Fictions Within Tax, 4 Savannah L. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Russell Spivak
Next, plaintiffs turn to Bush and Obama administration efforts to close Guantanamo ... [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
But French law does provide for the Louvre's actions: last December last, France's highest administrative court, the Conseil d’État, confirmed that a public entity can forbid a private entity to take pictures of works inside a public museum. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Socially Aware has published Social Links, a round up of the most important stories in the world of social media this week. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Ten Network has gone into administration after failing to win financial backing from its leading shareholders. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:00 pm by EEM
Reinhardt: "The government forces us to participate in ripping apart a family" (ImmigrationProf Blog, May 2017) [text]The Justice Department’s Petition for Writ of Certiorari in IRAP v. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
  Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 29 and 30 November and 1 December 2016 (Macfarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ). [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Bush administration in lawsuits over terrorism policies and interrogation of detainees. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
North Carolina, which asks whether a ban on social media use by sex offenders violates the First Amendment. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 6:06 am
Circuit Approval of the Constitutionality of SEC Administrative Proceedings Posted by Adam S. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm by The Blog Team
Davis, — F.3d —, 2016 WL 3245043 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (Marks rule, Fair Sentencing Act) The en banc court needed to decide “how to interpret the Supreme Court’s fractured opinion in Freeman v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
Before January 1, 2014, the Office of Medicaid had an official, published position on what the term “available” meant, as under the “Definition of Terms” in 130 CMR 515.001, the term “available” was defined as “a resource that is countable under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm by Brian E. Barreira
Before January 1, 2014, the Office of Medicaid had an official, published position on what the term “available” meant, as under the “Definition of Terms” in 130 CMR 515.001, the term “available” was defined as “a resource that is countable under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. [read post]