Search for: "Davis v. Stanford"
Results 81 - 100
of 222
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2017, 6:13 am
Wang (Harvard Business School), on Wednesday, December 13, 2017 Tags: Airgas v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
The first is Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
Davis, on the one hand, and Prof. [read post]
11 May 2007, 5:30 pm
Davis, on the one hand, and Prof. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
You surely recall the Hassell v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am
United States and Shaw v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Seth Davis weighs in on Kerry v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 6:55 am
Jay Wallace (University of California, Berkeley)12:45-1:05pmCommentaryPekka Väyrynen (University of California, Davis)1:05-1:45pmDiscussion SessionEND OF CONFERENCEAgain, conference registration is free but required for attendance. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:06 pm
Blogreaders will recall that last year the University of California, Davis, Law Review sponsored a daylong conference entitled "The Honorable John Paul Stevens. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
In 2007, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Stanford Law School Immigrants’ Rights Clinic, and the law firm Sidley Austin challenged the practice of prolonged detention in two class action cases—Garcia v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Stanford, CA Stanford University Press, 2007. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
U.S. (09-1533) — types of cocaine crimes requiring mandatory minimum sentence Stanford University Trustees v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
DAVIS L. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Karlan[1] On the eve of the Supreme Court’s hearing Davis v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Indeed, in People v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Davis and Jacob E. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 2:29 am
Further, they urge, the Supreme Court needs to reconcile inconsistent standards being applied by various circuits on the issue.The respondents, represented by Arthur Golden of Davis Polk, & Wardwell, counter that there is no problem with the settlement because it was a resolution of a legitimate patent dispute that did not exceed the bounds of a monopoly granted by patent.Weighing in on the side of the petitioners as amici, a group of 41 professors, led by Mark Lemley of… [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am
Briefly: At Human Rights At Home Blog, Martha Davis reviews last week’s argument in Lynch v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am
Tim Davie, acting director general, said that redactions were “driven by external legal advice. [read post]
