Search for: "Davis v. State of California et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2010, 5:23 am
Du Pont de Nemours & Co., et al., 82 F.3d 894 (9th Cir. 1996) (applying Hawaii law); Jacobs v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
THE CITY OF PALO ALTO et al., Defendants and Appellants. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am
Those cases are Freeman, et al., v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 1:40 pm
Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma d/b/a BKJ Solutions et al., Case No. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
You surely recall the Hassell v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:20 pm
The Navemar, The Pesaro, The Davis, The Siren, and United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 8:15 am
Army Corps of Engineers, et al., 17 F. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
(United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am
Working Arrangements Across Employment Sectors by Percentage of Workers In their own survey, Barrero et al. measured the full-time working arrangements in the United States as of 2023, identifying the percentage of employees who work fully onsite, fully remote, and those who have a hybrid arrangement. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 pm
Supreme Court case that decided the presidential election, and by David Boies, who represented former Vice President Al Gore in the same case.The case is Perry et al v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
Music Group Macao Commercial Offshore Limited, et al. v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 11:33 am
United States to Al-Haramain v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Christine Bruhn at the University of California, Davis published many of the pioneering studies on consumer acceptance, and recently made this comment about consumer acceptance of food irradiation in a series on the new FDA rule published by Jim Prevor’s Perishable Pundit (2008): “My work and that of other researchers over the last 20 years has found some people are ready to buy irradiated product right now….This group of consumers represents maybe 10… [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:10 am
Davis et. al., “Cigarette trafficking in five northeastern US cities,” Tobacco Control, Dec. 11, 2013, http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2013/12/11/tobaccocontrol-2013-051244. [4] See, e.g., Scott Drenkard, “Tobacco Taxation and Unintended Consequences: U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
State of California (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 1542. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
