Search for: "Davis v. State of Georgia et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
Baptista et. al. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
For the Georgia case’s purposes, the most relevant is Supremacy Clause immunity. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Davis (Assistant Professor, The University of Alabama), Brendan Nyhan (James O. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 5:10 am
§ 13-8-51 et al. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm
Grabbagreen Franchising LLC, et al., No. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Davis of Illinois and then-Chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight, the late John Lewis of Georgia, issued a joint report. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:32 am
Montana, et al.: Specific Jurisdiction’s Next Mile Marker (Nathaniel Fowler, Frost Brown Todd) We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:30 am
Ross et al. to Andrew Jackson. 1835. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:10 am
Davis et. al., “Cigarette trafficking in five northeastern US cities,” Tobacco Control, Dec. 11, 2013, http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/early/2013/12/11/tobaccocontrol-2013-051244. [4] See, e.g., Scott Drenkard, “Tobacco Taxation and Unintended Consequences: U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
The board implemented those recommendations.[16] The Court agreed with the board’s stated reasons for demand refusal, namely that commencing a suit would impair Wyndham’s ability to defend against the FTC suit. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
The board implemented those recommendations.[16] The Court agreed with the board’s stated reasons for demand refusal, namely that commencing a suit would impair Wyndham’s ability to defend against the FTC suit. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
Panopticon has examined the judgements in the cases of Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens & Ors and Deer v Oxford University. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:06 am
USCIS, et al., 15-11583 (11th Cir. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:06 am
USCIS, et al., 15-11583 (11th Cir. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
Espinoza, et al., 14-11890 (11th Cir. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:58 am
In a recent case, Davis et al., v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:34 am
METRO-DADE INVESTMENTS CO., et al., Respondents. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
Justice O'Connor cited it in the plurality opinion in Hamdi et al. v. [read post]
