Search for: "Davis v. Superintendent"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2014, 8:39 am
Justice Davis concurring generally and with special concurrence in which Justice Voigt joins. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:09 am
Supreme Court decision in Terry v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 9:33 am
In the habeas matter of Wilkerson v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 7:10 pm
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, Commissioner of the Mississippi Department ofCorrections; LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent of the Mississippi StatePenitentiary at ParchmanDefendants-AppelleesAppeal from the United States District Courtfor the Northern District of MississippiCase No. 4:07-CV-176Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 12:04 pm
The Second Circuit will be hearing the appeal of the district court decision in Leroy v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 7:20 pm
Burlington Admins’ Assoc. v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:09 am
Davis (06-666), although the ruling produced seven opinions. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
” In Davis v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 7:30 am
"The jury in the Zeno v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
Supreme Court decision in Terry v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 9:57 am
Davie Marketplace, LLC, 331 F. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The notion that federal courts should be the superintendents of state law is deeply wrong and disrespectful to basic notions of federalism. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:21 am
Horne v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:45 am
Mukasey Board of Immigration Appeals 08b0007p.062008/04/16 In re: Kenneth Davis v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
McCarthy v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 11:24 am
” In 1986, after years of confused and contradictory litigation in the lower courts, the Supreme Court affirmed the possibility of political-gerrymandering claims in Davis v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 10:45 am
COURT SAYS, Davis v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
On 20 January 2017, Sir Davie Eady heard applications in the case of Daryanani -v- Ramnani. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 7:35 am
See Davis. v. [read post]
