Search for: "Davis v. Turner"
Results 1 - 20
of 104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2012, 2:29 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Telefonica O2 UK Ltd & Ors v British Telecommunications Plc & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 1002 (25 July 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) AC v Farooq & Anor [2012] EWHC 1484 (QB) (30 July 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Davies v AIB Group (UK) Plc [2012] EWHC 2178 (Ch) (27 July 2012) Hughes & Ors v Bourne & Ors [2012] EWHC 2232 (Ch) (27 July 2012) High Court (Administrative Court)… [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 8:01 pm
Take, for instance, the “civil” contempt proceeding at issue in Turner v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 7:30 am
However, O’Brien noted that subsequently the Virginia Supreme Court in Turner v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 5:20 am
Castro v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:30 am
Jicarilla Apache Nation, is no page-turner. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 12:59 pm
Rodney Turner, No. 102,478 (Wyandotte)State appeal (petition for review)James L. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Jan. 07, 2008):Post- Turner v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 12:05 pm
King Fourth Amendment: Davis v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:19 am
Davis v Farrell Fritz, P.C. 2022 NY Slip Op 00399 Decided on January 26, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department deals with fraud in very big numbers. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:07 am
NORTH CAROLINA 10-10 TURNER, MICHAEL D. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 5:28 pm
Davis v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:47 am
" However, the documentary evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff's individual liability on the notes was a matter outside of the scope of the defendants' representation of the plaintiff in her capacity as co-executor of the estate (see CPLR 3211[a][1]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [*2]" [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:10 am
" However, the documentary evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff's individual liability on the notes was a matter outside of the scope of the defendants' representation of the plaintiff in her capacity as co-executor of the estate (see CPLR 3211[a][1]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [*2]" [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 2:57 am
" However, the documentary evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff's individual liability on the notes was a matter outside of the scope of the defendants' representation of the plaintiff in her capacity as co-executor of the estate (see CPLR 3211[a][1]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [*2]" [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 4:50 am
On Wednesday, the Court will hear argument in Turner v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am
Here, the defendants demonstrated, prima facie, that the acts that they allegedly failed to perform were beyond the scope of the engagement letter, which was prepared by the defendants and signed by the plaintiff (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d at 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
Davis J. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:57 am
In Bryant, you’ll recall (and if you don’t you can read about it here), the Court expanded upon the “primary purpose” test for determining whether a statement is testimonial, which the Court had earlier established in Davis v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 12:57 pm
” Report about Pratul V. [read post]
