Search for: "Davis v. Turner"
Results 1 - 20
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
Surveillance 65 parliamentarians, including David Davis MP, Caroline Lucas MP, Baroness Shami Chakrabati, Joanna Cherry KC MP and Sir Ed Davey MP, have called for an immediate stop to the use of live facial recognition for surveillance purposes, Big Brother Watch reports. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am
Here, the defendants demonstrated, prima facie, that the acts that they allegedly failed to perform were beyond the scope of the engagement letter, which was prepared by the defendants and signed by the plaintiff (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d at 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am
The claim arose out of two articles published by the Insurance Times on its website which a personal injury law firm, Bond Turner, and a post-accident assistance vehicle company, Direct Accident Management Limited, alleged to be defamatory. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
GUNDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:11 am
“An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer” (Attallah v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, 168 AD3d 1026, 1028 [2d Dept 2019]; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435 [2007]). [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am
“An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer” (Attallah v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, 168 AD3d 1026, 1028 [2d Dept 2019]; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435 [2007]). [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:19 am
Davis v Farrell Fritz, P.C. 2022 NY Slip Op 00399 Decided on January 26, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department deals with fraud in very big numbers. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm
The case is New Line Cinema v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 10:47 am
And Robert Loeb and Cesar Lopez-Morales wrote about United States v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 12:57 pm
” Report about Pratul V. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
" In re Conservatorship of Turner, No. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:45 am
” In an op-ed at Townhall, Mike Davis weighs in on Google v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
In Frese v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 10:17 pm
National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2004-1 v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
In Patel v. [read post]
