Search for: "Davis v. Wells"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,926
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2024, 2:01 pm
“We basically took everything that came through the door,” Sturns said.Sturns said he learned a lot in those early years working alongside Davis, who taught him to treat everybody in the courtroom fairly, from the client, to the judge, to the bailiffs, to the clerk – advice that he has carried through his career and has served him well including when he was later on the bench. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:15 am
Kruse v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:55 pm
It is well settled that this does not constitute invention. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:47 am
IP law might not be a high-risk first-year module where PAL can boost pass rates, but in a final year an improved student performance can impact positively on degree classification.Technology and innovative methods to incorporate into our teaching is addressed in Part V. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
New York Rifle and Pistol Assoc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
” The timeframe for decision in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm
(Wikimedia)Today's Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Jefferson Davis: President of the United States? [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
Although California was an early trendsetter in this area, with the decision in Buss v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm
An excerpt from today's Appellate Court of Connecticut decision in Ambrose v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday in what is shaping up to be the biggest election case since its ruling nearly 25 years ago in Bush v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court as well. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:18 pm
Davis, 208 N.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:40 am
The Sedlik v. [read post]