Search for: "Dawkins v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
Because, as Dawkins points out, once again, religion turns out to be the major culprit. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 4:59 pm
” Henderson and Dawkins might not be so lucky. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:03 am
RT (Zimbabwe) and others (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 38 - read judgment It is no answer to a refugee claim to say that the individual concerned should avoid persecution by lying and feigning loyalty to a regime which he does not support. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:54 pm
Swift v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWHC 2000 (QB) (18 July 2012). [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:46 am
The important question raised by this apparently silly litigation is therefore whether the time has come to rethink the shibboleth that states have a wide discretion to restrict forms of expression which offend religious beliefs (Murphy v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 3:56 am
Khaira v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am
MM and AO (A Child), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 668 The Secretary of State acted lawfully in not ordering an independent inquiry into the 2009 protest at the Immigration Detention Centre. [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:00 am
In MGN v United Kingdom, on balancing Article 8 and 10 rights, the Strasbourg Court stated (§142): The balancing of individual interests, which may well be contradictory, is a difficult matter and Contracting States must have a broad margin of appreciation in this respect since the national authorities are in principle better placed than this Court to assess whether or not there is a “pressing social need” capable of justifying an interference with one of… [read post]
6 May 2012, 11:55 am
In an opinion issued last week, Dawkins v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm
That case is the recent decision in McGrath v Dawkins, [2012] EWHC B3 (QB) which Lewis discussed in relation to user-generated content (UGC). [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The full judgment in the libel case of McGrath & Anor v Dawkins & Ors which was handed down on 30 March 2012 is now available ([2012] EWHC B3 (QB)). [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:13 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Nolan & Anor v R [2012] EWCA Crim 671 (04 April 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Solicitors Regulation Authority v Lawrence & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 421 (03 April 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) McGrath & Anor v Dawkins & Ors [2012] EWHC B3 (QB) (30 March 2012) Aziz v Lim [2012] EWHC 915 (QB) (05 April 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Rouse Tout A Tout, R (on the… [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
In Simao v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
The group’s e-petition calls on the Ministry of Justice to “leave FoI alone”, stating, “the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) has exposed the scandal of MPs’ expenses, and many examples of waste and improper behaviour by public authorities, politicians and public officials. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:39 am
In the courts Hurley & Moore, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation & Skills [2012] EWHC 201 (Admin) (17 February 2012). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm
Francis FitzGibbon QC considers Professor Dawkins’s Jury Delusion Having seen off God, Professor Dawkins turns his attention to another object of veneration, the jury, in the The New Statesman. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
The Financial Times has reproduced New International CEO Tom Mockridge’s memo to staff here (subscription required), which states “We must take care not to prejudge the outcome of the police interviews. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
There are no adjudicated PCC complaints to report but resolved complaints include: Sally Low v The Independent, Clause 1, 27/01/2012; Mr Syed Ahmad v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Colin Philip v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; David Bret v The Sun, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Damien Collis v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012, Mr Peter Reynolds v Lancashire Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012 Karen Birch v Oldham Evening… [read post]
