Search for: "Dawkins v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 64
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
She came to this country as a teenage refugee from Vietnam and later served in the United States Army. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm
That case is the recent decision in McGrath v Dawkins, [2012] EWHC B3 (QB) which Lewis discussed in relation to user-generated content (UGC). [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
McGrath v Dawkins and another, heard 10 and 11 November 2011 (HHJ Moloney QC). [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:00 am
In MGN v United Kingdom, on balancing Article 8 and 10 rights, the Strasbourg Court stated (§142): The balancing of individual interests, which may well be contradictory, is a difficult matter and Contracting States must have a broad margin of appreciation in this respect since the national authorities are in principle better placed than this Court to assess whether or not there is a “pressing social need” capable of justifying an interference with one of… [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 6:41 am
I don't think American atheists are living in the wrong country, and I find ample support for that belief in the Constitution, which bars religious tests for office, as well as state establishment of religion. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am
MM and AO (A Child), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 668 The Secretary of State acted lawfully in not ordering an independent inquiry into the 2009 protest at the Immigration Detention Centre. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The full judgment in the libel case of McGrath & Anor v Dawkins & Ors which was handed down on 30 March 2012 is now available ([2012] EWHC B3 (QB)). [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 1:23 pm
Dawkins, __ N.C. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
Bouchart reports: The landmark ruling stated that although the work of journalist Denis Robert contained inaccuracies, the thoroughness of his investigation and the public interest in the story outweighed the defamatory claims. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
Dawkins & Ors. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am
Oct. 17, 2023) and Dawkins v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm
Francis FitzGibbon QC considers Professor Dawkins’s Jury Delusion Having seen off God, Professor Dawkins turns his attention to another object of veneration, the jury, in the The New Statesman. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
In Simao v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
The Financial Times has reproduced New International CEO Tom Mockridge’s memo to staff here (subscription required), which states “We must take care not to prejudge the outcome of the police interviews. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star (Sheffield)… [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
On Sunday, Guido Fawkes released a preview of Alastair Campbell’s evidence to the Inquiry, stating that he had acquired it by “legal means”. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
Statements in Open Court and Apologies Media interest in privacy injunctions was revived with Imogen Thomas’ statement in open court in the case of CTB v NGN, which stated the claimant footballer had accepted there was no basis to accuse her of blackmail. [read post]
