Search for: "Day v. Barnes" Results 21 - 40 of 957
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2011, 2:06 am
Jardine from Fla. 3d DCA [which the Florida Supreme Court rejected six days later]. [read post]
2 Aug 2006, 8:22 am
Today (August 2, 2006), a lawyer asked on the Family Law Listserv a question that may be of substantial interest to some Michigan parents and lawyers in light of the Michigan supreme court's decision three days ago in Barnes v Jeudevine. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
 Barnes and Figueroa v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 4:09 am
SPENCE, P.C., APPELLANT; THE BARNES FIRM, P.C., SUCCESSOR TO CELLINO & BARNES, RESPONDENT. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 4:09 am
SPENCE, P.C., APPELLANT; THE BARNES FIRM, P.C., SUCCESSOR TO CELLINO & BARNES, RESPONDENT. [read post]
13 Aug 2016, 8:16 pm by Patricia Salkin
Perschbacher v Freeborn County Board of Commissioners, 2016 WL 4162776 (MN App. 8/8/2016)Filed under: Agricultural Uses, Current Caselaw, Special Use/Exception [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 10:14 am by Steve Hall
On the second day of its 2011 term, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Maples v. [read post]
14 Jun 2006, 9:32 am
See this post and Judge Barnes' opinion in Anglemyer.The blog topics mount. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:30 am by azatty
Today is National Doughnut Day—or, if you were born in a barn, National Donut Day. [read post]
14 May 2011, 11:27 am by pfriedman
Here’s a breathtakingly broad decision: The Indiana Supreme Court, in Barnes v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:48 am
As a followup on the interrelationship of KSR v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:12 am by Laura Sandwell
Listed for two days from this morning in Courtroom 2 is the appeal of Barnes (as former Court Appointed Receiver) v The Eastenders Group & Anor, to be heard by L Hale, L Kerr, L Wilson, L Hughes and L Toulson. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 11:56 am by Ted Brooks
We were proud to work with the TI/Jones Day team on that trial (yes, we used TrialDirector to great effect). [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes invites readers to “reflect on the fact that — once again — folks had to sleep on the sidewalk for days to see or hear the Supreme Court at work,” waiting for up to four days to gain access to the oral argument earlier this month in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 12:52 pm
Another example of the wide berth given to non-scientific expert testimony under Daubert is United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 2:37 pm by Andrew Hamm
Ian Millhiser of ThinkProgress discusses the court’s ruling this morning in Endrew F. v. [read post]