Search for: "Day v. Bridges" Results 141 - 160 of 1,136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am by Amira Mikhail, Jordan Brunner
The second executive order took effect on March 16 and included a 90-day ban on travel from six countries (this time excluding Iraq), as well as a suspension of the Refugee Assistance Program for 120 days. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 9:01 pm
United States (06-7517), Bridge v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:29 am
Quite a fact pattern here: Constellation Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm by Blog Editorial
Houldsworth and another v Bridge Trustees Limited and another and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 20 – 21 June 2011. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 10:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
Hill Country Estates Homeowner’s Association v Guernsey, 2015 WL 2160510 (TX App. 5/7/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://law.justia.com/cases/texas/thirteenth-court-of-appeals/2015/13-13-00395-cv.htmlFiled under: Current Caselaw, Enforcement [read post]
5 May 2017, 3:28 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
It's the concept of "embedded knowledge" and how it can bridge the often confusing gap between protected trade secrets that belong to the company and unprotected skills that belong to an employee.For more on this topic, see my post from March of 2014.Waymo v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:38 am by Carolina Attorneys
After several days of pre-trial motions and jury selection, Judge Caldwell presided over a five-day trial. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 8:13 am by Amy Howe
Editor’s Note: An earlier version of this post ran on September 23, 2019, as an introduction to this blog’s symposium on Kelly v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:27 pm
  The historic deal broke an enduring stalemate between two countries divided by just 90 miles of water but oceans of mistrust and hostility dating from the days of Theodore Roosevelt’s charge up San Juan Hill and the nuclear brinkmanship of the Cuban missile crisis. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 3:34 am
   Martin (pictured at left giving the oral argument in State v. [read post]