Search for: "Day v. Secretary of Health and Human Services"
Results 1 - 20
of 495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2017, 8:23 pm
Department of Health and Human Services 16-808 Issue: Whether the Secretary of Health and Human Services may ignore the statutory payment rate for a drug covered under Part B of the Medicare Act and instead cap payments at a physician’s costs to acquire that drug, either directly or under the guise of assessing “medical reasonableness. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:25 pm
Department of Health and Human Services (No. 10-2328)). [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:24 pm
The petition of the day is: Bayou Shores SNF, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 12:00 pm
Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, upholding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, was issued this morning. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 2:33 pm
Answering a question from a member of Congress, Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia M. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:26 pm
Bernhardt (Federal Recognition)Navajo Health Foundation v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 1:35 pm
This 20 per cent increase has had a hugely detrimental impact on human health and on economic productivity: people are sick and unable to work. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 8:20 am
The issue was whethera 180-day statutory time limit for filing an appeal with the Provider Reimbursement Review Board from a final Medicare payment determination is subject to equitable tolling, meaning that a court has power to delay the running of the time limit in the interests of fairness.In an opinion delivered by Justice Ginsburg, the Court held unanimously that the 180-day period is not jurisdictional and that the Secretary of the Department of Health… [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 8:20 am
The issue was whethera 180-day statutory time limit for filing an appeal with the Provider Reimbursement Review Board from a final Medicare payment determination is subject to equitable tolling, meaning that a court has power to delay the running of the time limit in the interests of fairness.In an opinion delivered by Justice Ginsburg, the Court held unanimously that the 180-day period is not jurisdictional and that the Secretary of the Department of Health… [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 9:22 am
On March 27, United States District Court for the District of Columbia Judge James Boasberg ruled that Department of Health & Human Services Secretary Azar’s approval of work and community engagement requirements in Arkansas and Kentucky were arbitrary and capricious, halting their implementation. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:05 am
CARVONDELLA BRADLEY, et. al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus SECRETARY, U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT2011 U.S. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 9:17 am
Leavitt, Secretary of the Health and Human Services. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:17 am
Introduction Judgment of the Supreme Court is handed down today in the case of Janah v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (“SSFCA”) and Libya, and Benkharbouche v SSFCA. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm
Section 1135 Waiver Issues and COVID-19 (March 25, 2020): On January 31, 2020, Secretary Alex Azar, of the US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), used his authority under the Public Health Service Act to declare a public health emergency in the United States.[1] Secretary Azar determined that a public health emergency had existed nationwide since January 27, 2020. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 9:52 am
Allina Health Services, 139 S. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
The Department of Health and Human Services (“HSS”) arguably did just that in promulgating its rule specifying the administrative dispute resolution (“ADR”) process[1] for conflicts between drug makers and certain health care providers. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 6:58 am
Allina Health Services v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 8:38 am
The secretary of Health and Human Services has long delegated authority to make the second determination to the FDA commissioner. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:58 am
Disclosures of PHI are required only in limited circumstances, such as when required by the Secretary of Health and Human Services to investigate a covered entity’s compliance with the Privacy Rule and to the individual pursuant to the individual’s right of access. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 8:00 am
Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1984]: Reviewing the PrerogativeRichard Drabble6. [read post]
