Search for: "Day v. Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2024, 6:09 am
Smith Jewish Day School of Greater Washington, Inc. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 12:42 pm
The Smith v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:41 am
The Supreme Court heard argument this morning in Smith v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 4:38 am
Smith (Jean) v Northamptonshire County Council Court of Appeal “A council which had no control over a ramp not on its property was not strictly liable to an employee who was injured on it. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 7:31 am
Smith v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
Supreme Court’s 1979 decision of Smith v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 8:12 pm
The petitions of the day are: Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:10 am
Since last week's judgment in Smith - in which the Court of Appeal ruled that the Human Rights Act, in particular article 2, applies to British troops even on the battlefield, I've been thinking about the judgment (one reason why I've not blogged for several days) and I'm troubled by it. [read post]
30 May 2008, 1:33 am
Regina (Smith) v Assistant Deputy Coroner for Oxfordshire; Secretary of State for Defence v Same Queen’s Bench Division “The right to life, protected by article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, could extend to members of the Armed Forces, wherever they might be; whether it did so would depend on the circumstances of the particular case. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:20 pm
The petition of the day is: Turner v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
The petition of the day is: McLaughlin v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:06 am
The petition of the day is: Title: Wetzel v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:22 pm
Smith v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 3:30 pm
Sturgell and Smith v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 10:00 am
., v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:20 am
Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police House of Lords “Considerations of public policy precluded the imposition of a common law duty of care on police who, in discharging their public duty of combating and investigating crime, had not protected a member of the public from a violent attack, the risk of which and the identity and whereabouts of the likely attacker he had reported to them. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 2:32 am
Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police Court of Appeal “While it was not reasonable to expect the police to answer in damages to every individual whose life or health might have been spared or saved by more competent police work, where someone's life or safety had been so firmly placed in their hands as to make it incumbent on them to take at least elementary steps to protect it, unexcused neglect to do so could sound in damages if harm resulted. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 3:00 pm
The petition of the day is: Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 12:48 pm
(Posted one day late) Employment Division v. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 8:23 pm
The petition of the day is: Smith v. [read post]
