Search for: "Day v. Stearns"
Results 41 - 60
of 124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2008, 12:27 pm
Millemann of Weintraub Genshlea Chediak in the firm's IP Law Blog State found liable for beating on UT campus - Tennessee lawyer John Day of Day & Blair in his blog, Day on Torts ESOPs and company stock matches to 401(k): the Bear Stearns lesson - Lancaster attorney Michael Moore of Russell Krafft & Gruber in the firm's Pennsylvania Employment Law Blog Government reply briefly field with Supreme Court in Murphy v. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
Rosen v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:00 am
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 5:26 am
” United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:37 pm
We did a post the other day about, among other things, the applicability of the TwIqbal federal pleading standard in removed cases. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 6:54 am
Am l-o-v-i-n-g the headlines this morning. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 11:59 am
We're talking about the law here.)Just last week, we clued you in to our longstanding interest in whether the last defendant served with a complaint has thirty days from service on it to remove, or whether the removal clock runs from the date of service on the first-served defendant.Then we saw City of Cleveland v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 7:18 am
Accordingly, Starbucks was denied summary judgment on the employee’s retaliation claim (McAleer v Starbucks Corp, January 31, 2014, Stearns, R). [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:28 am
Because the employer provided no advance notice to affected employees, but only an explanation after the mass layoff occurred, the unforeseeable business circumstances exception did not apply (Torres v Niche, Inc, December 18, 2013, Stearns, R). [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
Any improvement, Stearns says, will come from the USDA, FDA, and United States legislature. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 8:30 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Court: Now Is Not the Best Time to Ask Courts to Resolve "Minor Differences"
25 Mar 2020, 6:10 am
"] In Harnois v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 9:02 pm
Clearly another job for the Marshall, Texas courts [SE Texas Record; Point of Law; more] Bench trial results in $55 million verdict against U.S. government after Army employee on business runs red light and paralyzes small child [OC Register] Vision in a purple Gremlin: her Yale Law days shaped Hillary in many ways [Stearns/McClatchy] Zero tolerance for motorists' blood-alcohol -- are we sure we want to go there? [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 1:27 pm
The statute did not state that the threat of class action must be set forth, according to the court.Dismissal of the CLRA claims was affirmed in two of the actions on appeal in which the proposed class of ticket purchasers was so broadly defined that material misrepresentations to the whole class could not be shown.The August 22 opinion in Stearns v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:56 am
Once a Notice of Covered Action is posted, individuals have 90 calendar days to apply for an award. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:29 am
When they met, Malkus said Kim Rothstein told him, "I can't go anywhere these days. [read post]
12 May 2008, 4:16 am
And there is this Delaware development from Travis Laster: In Ryan v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:44 am
The case pitted the American Public Health Association v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 3:52 am
Here, the CBA allows employees to treat certain non-work days such as vacation, sick and personal days as hours actually worked for the purpose of determining overtime hours. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 5:11 am
U.S. v. [read post]
