Search for: "De Conti v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
However, the Pennsylvania Superior Court utilized a different rationale than that voiced by the trial court in Rush to invalidate the regular use exclusion.The Superior Court in Rush noted that the plaintiff was injured in a car accident, he was legally entitled to recover from the underinsured tortfeasors, and Erie had never obtained a 75 Pa.C.S.A. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Saugus, MA; Sharon De Patto, President) Bb & Ty Trading Inc. [read post]