Search for: "De Havilland v. FX Networks, LLC"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2018, 9:14 am
FX Networks LLC, Supreme Ct. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s order [the case is… [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 8:47 am
FX Networks, LLC, No. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:10 am
FX Networks LLC over De Havilland’s portrayal in the FX docudrama Feud: Bette and Joan. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:10 am
FX Networks LLC over De Havilland’s portrayal in the FX docudrama Feud: Bette and Joan. [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:00 am
FX Networks, LLC, Olivia De Havilland advanced a false light claim over her portrayal in the docudrama “Feud: Bette and Joan”. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 12:54 pm
FX Networks, LLC (2018) 21 Cal.App.5th 845, 862 [name of Olivia De Havilland to promote a program about her]; Polydoros v. [read post]
