Search for: "De More by De More v. Dieters"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Moreover, the very threat of a veto turns the legislature into a de-facto tricameral institution insofar as the House and the Senate alone cannot in fact work its will save in extraordinary situations. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 2:35 pm
Rechtsvergleichung und Rechtsangleichung Jürgen BASEDOW Soft Law for Private Relations in the European Union Spyridon V. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
Dieter Brändle, the first President of the Swiss Federal Patent Court who will retire at the end of 2017. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 5:08 am
-Dieter Martiny on the PIL dimensions of the 2010 agreement between France and Germany on a new optional matrimonial property regime. - Horatia Muir Watt on the follow-up to Kiobel (the case of Sexual Minorities v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
Section III then develops the more important characteristics of this new dynamic and permeable constitutional framework. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 9:07 am
Dieter Martiny: “Deutscher Kündigungsschutz für das Personal ausländischer Botschaften? [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
Section III then develops the more important characteristics of this new dynamic and permeable constitutional framework. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:58 pm
The first decision (Google & Aufeminin.com v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:58 pm
The first decision (Google & Aufeminin.com v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:45 am
Structurally, the draft Directive is organized into five Titles, containing General Provisions (I), rules on CMOs (II), MTL (III), Enforcement Measures (IV), and Reporting and Final Provisions (V). [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:13 am
It has been four months since the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Case C-604/10 Football Dataco Ltd, and Ors. v Yahoo! [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:44 am
some more precisions on the status of hosting providers [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm
The program of harmonization and unification of conflicts of laws (“Rome I”–“Rome V” and more) obliges to describe the scope of each regulation. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 12:38 pm
” – the English abstract reads as follows: Friedrich Carl v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:29 am
Rubin v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:14 am
Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:23 pm
The authors criticise the recent ECJ judgment in Wood Floor Solutions Andreas Domberger GmbH v. [read post]