Search for: "Deal v. Warner" Results 1 - 20 of 420
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2011, 7:07 am by Lawrence Cunningham
Though common in sports player contracts and in product endorsement deals, as Tiger Woods can tell you, and do appear in Hollywood contracts, as Mel Gibson can  attest, they are rarer in Hollywood, where bad behavior is widespread. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 11:00 am
One can imagine this turning into a case similar to that of Tiffany v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 7:30 am by Glenn Reynolds
Mark Warner (D-Va.) is urging the bipartisan “supercommittee” tasked with deficit cuts to pursue a deal in the $4 trillion range. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 7:57 am
We've been asked two questions repeatedly since the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
Ever since the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Warner Lambert v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 10:18 am by lpbncontracts
I recently covered the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing in part through the fun case of Locke v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 11:40 am
Perusing his daily fare yesterday, this Kat ran across two items, one right after the other, both dealing with the release of the highly promoted film— “Batman v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:42 am by Brian Cuban
  They have already posted two legally erroneous articles insinuating that arbitration is a done deal for Lorre and Warner Brothers because the agreement requires arbitration(against Warner) and JAMS has also “accepted” the parties  into arbitration. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
The first wave of defense briefing is now complete in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:20 am
Supreme Court's ruling in Kolstad v American Dental Association, 527 US 526. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
This Kat posted a short report of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, judgment delivered by Lord Justice Floyd in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556, and has in the meantime been cogitating and ruminating (hard as that is for a non-ruminant carnivore) on what it all means.To remind readers on where we were before this appeal decision, Warner-Lambert marketed the drug pregabalin for three authorised indications… [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 6:44 am
Supreme Court Deals Blow to Lawsuits Against Defective Products", the Court heard arguments on February 25 in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]